<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Anne Enright: The Thing You Have Written Is A Piece Of Shit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nancyrawlinson.com/2008/07/anne-enright-the-thing-you-have-written-is-a-piece-of-shit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nancyrawlinson.com/2008/07/anne-enright-the-thing-you-have-written-is-a-piece-of-shit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 03:39:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: nancyrawlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyrawlinson.com/2008/07/anne-enright-the-thing-you-have-written-is-a-piece-of-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>nancyrawlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 12:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancyrawlinson.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-11</guid>
		<description>That is an excellent question. It goes to the heart of what most writers struggle with: lack of confidence about their own work, and the seemingly impossible task of objectively judging its worth. The short answer, here, is that there are three things that I think a writer can do to deal with these issues: work on developing their own intuition about their work, work on developing their critical responses through an understanding of craft, and build in an external feedback loop. I think these processes are worthy of longer explication, so see the next blog post for a more worked-out reply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is an excellent question. It goes to the heart of what most writers struggle with: lack of confidence about their own work, and the seemingly impossible task of objectively judging its worth. The short answer, here, is that there are three things that I think a writer can do to deal with these issues: work on developing their own intuition about their work, work on developing their critical responses through an understanding of craft, and build in an external feedback loop. I think these processes are worthy of longer explication, so see the next blog post for a more worked-out reply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anna rawlinson</title>
		<link>http://www.nancyrawlinson.com/2008/07/anne-enright-the-thing-you-have-written-is-a-piece-of-shit/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>anna rawlinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 12:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nancyrawlinson.wordpress.com/?p=10#comment-10</guid>
		<description>I agree too - but how do you know/judge the quality of what you have written? How do you know if it really is a piece of shit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree too &#8211; but how do you know/judge the quality of what you have written? How do you know if it really is a piece of shit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

